Skip to content
Call Us Today! 212-533-4646 | MON-FRI 12PM - 4PM (EST)
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
Search for:
About Us
UNWLA 100
Publications
FAQ
Annual Report 2024
Annual Report 2023
Annual Report 2022
Annual Report 2021
Initiatives
Advocate
Educate
Cultivate
Care
News
Newsletters
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Join UNWLA
Become a Member
Volunteer With Us
Donate to UNWLA
Members Portal
Shop to Support Ukraine
Search for:
Print
Print Page
Download
Download Page
Download Right Page
Open
1
2-3
4-5
6-7
8-9
10-11
12-13
14-15
16-17
18-19
20-21
22-23
24-25
26-27
28-29
30-31
32-33
34-35
36
T h e la te M ay D e m e y A TRIBUTE On Aug. 1 a fte r a b rief illness our frien d and 2nd president of B ranch 72, M ay Demey, passed aw ay. Our B ranch, R egional Council and th e U krainian Catholic C hurch lost a cooperative and tireless w orker. Scores of friends саше to bid a te a rfu l farew ell, b u t know ing fun-loving M ay we are certain she would not w ant us to m ourn and grieve b u t p e r haps rem em ber h er in our p ra y ers ; b u t we will, nevertheless, m iss h er generosity, h er fra n k ness and straig h tfo rw ard n ess, h er good sp irits and h ea rty laugh as well as h er zest fo r liv ing and enjoym ent of th e sim ple pleasures. Sleep well, dear Soyuzanka, know ing full well, you will live in th e h e a rts of your friends. V itchnaya P am y at! - - - K. Lucyshyn Br. 72 in New York City UNITY VIA DIVERSITY The article of Alice B erw ecky ‘S tren g th th ro u g h U n d erstan d ing,’ p rin ted in No. of O ur Life, stru ck me by its contents. Its in tere stin g proposals cannot rem ain unansw ered. The chief assum ptions p re sented in th is article tend to re flect some th o u g h ts of our E n g lish speaking branch m em bers. The a u th o r presum es th a t some artificial b arriers ex ist betw een th e tw o v ital and d istin ct groups th a t form our organization. O ur fellow m em ber states th a t she is unable to find any d istin g u ish able differences betw een U k rain ian A m ericans and A m erican U krainians, since th ey have th e sam e goals, nam ely, of preserv ing th e U krainian culture, and m aking A m erica and th e world aw are of U kraine and h er pro b lems. T herefore, th ere is no legi tim a te reason for th e separation of th e E nglish and U krainian speaking branches of th e League. They should be fused into a single unit, th u s, co n trib u tin g to a b e tte r u nd erstand in g betw een both groups, and u lti m ately, resolving th e linguistic difficulties of both branches. Of course, these proposals are all very fine and idealistic. They also show a deep concern and com m itm ent to our organization. Y et th ese ideas tend to become im practical and un realistic if closely exam ined. T he au th o r seem s to confuse th e issues in volved, since th e issue h ere clear ly is no t th e differences betw een U krainian A m ericans or A m er ican U krainians, because th ere sim ply is no difference, b u t only th e tw istin g around of absolute adjectives. P erhaps, M rs. B er wecky im properly p hrased h er sentence. The proper p h rasin g is: w h at are th e differences be tw een m em bers born in th e U nited S tates who are p a rt of th e U krainian ethnic group, and those m em bers who are n a tu r alized U krainian citizens? N aturally, differences exist, w hich are not only linguistic, as th e au th o r contends, b u t also, behavioural and environm ental. T here is absolutely no difference as to th e ir im portance and func. tion w ithin our L e a g u e ; to be sure, th e ir assignm ents are to propagate th e U krainian culture and cause, and to preserve th e ir ethnic heritage, as th e au th o r ju stly discerns. B ut, A m erican born U k rain ians m ust realize th a t th ey are th e products of a d iffe ren t envi ronm ent and of d iffe ren t b eh a viour p a tte rn s th a n th e ir fellow U. S. naturalized U krainians. The nativ e born reflect an A m er ican type of upbringing, though w ith some stro n g U krainian overtones. U sually clubs operate on a neighborhood regional basis. The m em bers are quite freq uen tly common friends, all having some identical origin or goal, living som ew hat closely to g eth er w ith in a common te rrito ry . The League is no exception to th is prescribed rule. M any women join clubs to seek some sm all re lief from daily dom estic tension and th e anxieties w hich engulf them . They desire to create la s t ing and m eaningful friendships w ith one a n o th e r; th ey endeavor to aid th e ir com m unity and re solve som e problem s w ithin th e ir own kind of people in order th a t th ey will feel a t ease w ith them and to perfo rm th e ir ta sk efficiently. Indeed, th e UNW LA is a r e alistic and practical o rganiza tion, using th e ratio n al approach to solving p articu lar situ ation s and problem s w hich arise w ith in it. This process has enabled th e organization to cope w ith all so rts of dissent, and endure th e storm clouds of discontent. E v ery th in g is based on consensus and m ajo rity rule, w ith respect fo r m inority views. No lim ita tions, no b arriers, no discrim ina tion exists in th e UNW LA ag ain st m ino rity or m ajo rity m em bers, or branches. The L eague recognizes individual choice and freedom as_ .the cor n erstone of th e organization. T herefore, th ro u g h careful r e search and tactfu l handling th e organization has form ulated a policy based upon a dem ocratic fram ew ork, w hich enables m od eration and consensus to operate freely, while leaving room fo r new ideas and peaceful dissent. T his policy exists due to th e fa c to rs of diversity, and dedication of purpose, w hich, n o t only sup p o rts th e policy, b u t has enabled th e League to survive. Irene Palevich Member of Branch 98 O U R LIFE Edited by Editorial Board Published by the Ukrainian National Women’s League of America, Inc. 4936 N. 13th St. Philadelphia, Pa. 19141 НАШЕ ЖИТТЯ — ЖОВТЕНЬ, 1969 Видання C оюзу Українок A мерики - перевидано в електронному форматі в 2012 році . A рхів C У A - Ню Йорк , Н . Й . C Ш A.
Page load link
Go to Top